social media
Switzerland plans tougher social media protections for minors
The Swiss government plans to introduce stronger protections for minors on social media platforms and search engines. A bill due in June 2027 would also expand reporting procedures for potentially unlawful content and require greater transparency from major online services.

The Federal Council will ask Parliament to strengthen online protections for minors, with a dispatch due by the end of June 2027. The plan targets social media platforms and search engines operated by major companies such as Google, Facebook and YouTube. It follows a consultation on the proposed Act on Communication Platforms and Search Engines, which ran from October 2025 to February 2026.
The government says the services covered by the law have become important sources of information and increasingly shape public debate. Its proposal would therefore give users stronger rights and require online providers to explain more clearly how their services operate.
Youth protection forms the most significant addition to the preliminary draft. Platforms and search engines would have to examine the risks their services create or amplify for minors. They would then need to introduce measures designed to reduce those risks. The proposal also targets the commercial use of children’s attention: large platforms would be barred from showing personalised advertising to minors.
The Federal Department of the Environment, Transport, Energy and Communications, known by its German abbreviation UVEK, must now prepare the government’s dispatch. Parliament will decide whether the measures become law.
Make platforms assess youth risks
The proposed rules would make risk assessment a legal duty for major online services. Providers would have to analyse whether their products expose minors to harmful risks or intensify existing ones. The source material does not specify which risks would be covered or which technical safeguards companies would have to deploy. Those details will need to emerge during the drafting process and parliamentary debate.
The approach places responsibility on the services themselves. Search engines and social networks would be expected to identify risks linked to the design and operation of their platforms, then take steps to reduce them. The obligation would sit alongside broader requirements for user rights and corporate transparency.
A separate change would expand the reporting procedure to include all content suspected of being unlawful. The proposal would therefore affect how users flag potentially illegal material and how providers process those reports. The government has not announced a single new reporting channel or a specific response deadline in the information available.
Personalised advertising would face a clear restriction. Large platforms would be prohibited from displaying such advertising to minors. The rule would address the use of personal data and online behaviour to target children, while leaving Parliament to determine the final scope and enforcement arrangements.
Carry consultation into Parliament
The consultation produced 214 responses, with a majority supporting the Federal Council’s proposal. The process gave political parties, cantons, organisations and other interested parties an opportunity to comment on the Act on Communication Platforms and Search Engines. The government has now reviewed those responses and instructed UVEK to move towards a dispatch.
Support crosses several major political groupings. The Centre Party, the Social Democratic Party and the Greens back the proposal. The Greens had also introduced parliamentary motions calling for stronger protection of minors online. Their demands helped push youth protection higher on the government’s agenda.
The cantons have also played a significant role. Twenty-two cantons support the proposal, according to the consultation report. Switzerland’s federal structure gives cantonal positions weight as Parliament considers legislation that will affect public authorities, families and businesses across the country.
The consultation outcome does not settle the bill’s future. The Federal Council must still present its dispatch, and both chambers of Parliament will have to examine the text. Amendments remain possible, particularly on the definition of platform risks, the duties imposed on providers and the protection of users’ speech and access to information.