Risks in Swiss property market ease for first time in three years

The risk index dropped to 3.5 points in the second quarter of 2026, offering the first sign of easing in Switzerland’s property market after three years of deterioration. Moneypark’s Real Estate Risk Index fell from 3.7 points in the previous quarter and moved back into the middle of its five point scale.

The shift reflects two supportive forces: persistently low interest rates and stronger economic sentiment. Financing conditions have remained favourable for borrowers, while improved confidence has helped reduce some pressure across the housing market. Moneypark reported the change on Wednesday, August 26, through an assessment covered by Keystone-SDA.

The improvement remains limited. A lower index does not mean that homes have become broadly affordable or that market risks have disappeared. Prices continue to rise faster than general inflation, and households face a labour market that has weakened over the past year.

Switzerland’s housing market also remains constrained by limited supply. High immigration and insufficient construction have kept competition for homes intense in many areas. That shortage continues to support prices, even as the risk picture improves. For buyers, the latest index reading signals slightly better conditions, not a clear break from the market’s long-running pressures.

Low interest rates remain the main cushion under the market, according to Moneypark. Cheaper borrowing can support mortgage affordability, encourage transactions and give existing homeowners more room to manage financing costs. Improved economic sentiment adds another layer of support by strengthening confidence among households and investors.

Those conditions have helped push the RERI lower, but they do not affect every household equally. Mortgage applicants still need to meet Switzerland’s affordability tests, while buyers must contend with high purchase prices and limited choice. The benefit of lower rates can therefore be offset by the amount borrowers need to pay for a home.

The market’s resilience also depends on the wider economy. The average unemployment rate rose to 3.1% in the second quarter, compared with 3.0% in the first quarter and 2.8% a year earlier. A rising jobless rate can reduce the number of households able to buy, weaken confidence among prospective owners and make existing housing costs harder to carry.

Moneypark’s assessment places these trends side by side. Financial conditions have improved, but employment has become a more visible source of risk. That balance explains why the index has eased only slightly rather than falling sharply.

House prices still grew 3.8 percentage points faster than inflation in the second quarter, keeping affordability under pressure even as the gap narrowed. The premium stood at 4.2 percentage points in the previous quarter and 5.0 points a year earlier.

The slowdown in the gap offers some relief, but Moneypark found no evidence of a broad-based price correction. Limited supply continues to support asking prices, and buyers remain willing to pay high amounts for properties that come onto the market. That dynamic is especially important in a country where new housing construction has struggled to keep pace with population growth and demand.

For renters and would-be owners, the figures point to a market moving more slowly rather than reversing direction. A home that rises in value more quickly than consumer prices becomes harder to reach for households whose wages do not keep pace. The same pressure can feed into rents as tenants compete for scarce apartments.

Conditions also vary by region. Moneypark highlighted marked regional differences, meaning national figures can conceal sharper risks or stronger resilience in individual local markets. Buyers therefore face a housing market where location remains decisive, alongside mortgage costs, income security and available supply.