Crans-Montana Fire Probe Widens as Four More Suspects Indicted

Thirteen suspects now face the weight of the Swiss justice system as the Crans-Montana fire probe expands with unprecedented speed. A staggering four new indictments were handed down this week, dragging more high-ranking officials into a criminal investigation that has shocked the Valais region. These individuals, including the current municipal councillor in charge of security and the former president of Chermignon, must now answer for a tragedy that claimed 41 lives and left 115 others scarred. The Valais public prosecutor is leaving no stone unturned, shifting the focus from the bar's owners to the very authorities tasked with keeping the public safe. This isn't just a trial; it is a systemic audit of Swiss administrative accountability. As the list of defendants grows, the narrative of a 'freak accident' is rapidly being replaced by a documented trail of institutional failure. The upcoming hearings in May and June will force these officials to confront the families of the victims in what is becoming the most significant negligence case in modern Swiss history.

For 2,190 days, the safety of 'Le Constellation' bar was left to chance. Prosecutors have uncovered a chilling reality: no safety inspections were conducted at the venue for six consecutive years prior to the New Year's Day inferno. Despite a clear mandate for annual checks, the bar became a ticking time bomb of negligence. The investigation suggests the fire ignited when champagne sparklers—a staple of high-end Swiss nightlife—touched sound-insulation foam that should have been fire-retardant but wasn't. While the owners, Jacques and Jessica Moretti, face charges of manslaughter by negligence, the focus has pivoted to why the system failed to intervene. 'We didn't get answers to the key question—why there were no inspections for six years,' says lawyer Alain Viscolo. This void in oversight allowed a basement level to become a death trap in minutes. The failure to inspect isn't just a clerical error; it is the central pillar of the prosecution's case, suggesting that the tragedy was entirely preventable had the law been followed.

Crans-Montana's local government is digging in its heels, mounting a fierce defense of Mayor Nicolas Féraud following his grueling 11-hour interrogation. The municipality claims it provided every resource requested, noting that the public safety department's staff surged by 500%—from one to five full-time employees—between 2017 and 2024. 'The city council has systematically responded favorably to all requests for staff increases,' the administration stated, effectively shifting the blame onto departmental heads rather than political leadership. However, this defense creates a sharp contrast with the reality of the tragedy. If the resources were there and the staff was the largest in the canton, why did the bar go uninspected? Lawyers for the victims are calling this a 'plethora of people in charge who are responsible for very little.' The tension between the mayor’s claims of ignorance and the department's failure to act is the primary battleground. As the municipality attempts to shield its leadership, the public is left wondering how such a robustly funded department could miss a six-year inspection gap.