After a seventh day of protests against planned budget cuts, Vaud civil servants have voted to continue their strike indefinitely. The unions are urging parliament to reject the 2026 budget and its associated CHF305 million in savings measures.

"Against austerity, we wonât give up"
"Itâs hard to say whether the number of strikers has increased, but this is already the fourth day of the strike and the mobilisation remains very strong."
The standoff in Vaud has reached a critical boiling point. In a near-unanimous vote on Thursday evening, civil servants declared an 'endless strike,' signaling a dramatic escalation in their battle against the canton's austerity measures. This marks the seventh day of protests since October, but the mood has shifted from warning shots to open trench warfare. The unions have thrown down the gauntlet, urging parliament to reject the 2026 budget entirely.
Under the defiant slogan 'Against austerity, we wonât give up,' the mobilization is expanding rapidly. What began as sporadic stoppages has morphed into a 'total strike' mandate, threatening to grind public services to a halt indefinitely. The resolution passed Thursday leaves no room for ambiguity: the workforce is digging in. With a major procession planned for next Tuesday in Lausanne and a follow-up decision meeting scheduled for Wednesday, the administration faces a relentless wave of disruption that shows zero signs of cresting.
The impact of the strike is tearing through the canton's educational infrastructure with staggering force. The Vaud Department of Education and Vocational Training (DEF) confirmed a 'strong mobilization,' admitting that more than one-third of all state employees in compulsory education walked off the job on Thursday. This isn't just a disruption; it's a systemic shutdown in many districts.
While some schools managed to limp along, others were forced to close their doors completely, leaving parents scrambling and classrooms silent. The unrest has breached the walls of higher education as well. At the University of Lausanne (UNIL), the situation turned physical as strikers barricaded the Anthropole and Géopolis buildings starting at 7:00 AM, effectively blocking access to thousands of students and staff. Cora Antonioli, president of the SSP-Vaud union, noted that while exact numbers are fluid, the mobilization is 'very strong' and expanding into new sectors, proving that the anger is contagious and spreading fast.
At the heart of this fury lies a single, contentious figure: CHF 305 million. This is the magnitude of the savings measures embedded in the government's draft 2026 budgetâa sum the unions view as a direct assault on public service quality and worker stability. The trade unions, including SSP, FSF, and Sud, are not merely asking for tweaks; they are demanding the Vaud parliament torch the current budget proposal and its related decrees.
The economic tug-of-war has transformed into a high-stakes political siege. Protesters have already staged five demonstrations in Lausanne since early October, including two directly in front of the parliament building this week as debates raged inside. The message from the streets is crystal clear: the cost of these cuts will be paid in political chaos if the government refuses to pivot. The unions argue that the proposed decrees 'do not respect trade union demands,' setting the stage for a prolonged fiscal showdown that threatens to derail the canton's financial planning for the coming year.
The dialogue between the state and its servants has collapsed into a toxic game of blame. The union coalition accuses the government of a 'policy of (non-)communication' and a complete unwillingness to negotiate seriously. They claim the administration is trying to offload the responsibility for unpopular political choices onto the parliament, effectively washing their hands of the crisis.
However, the government is firing back. President Christelle Luisier vehemently denies the accusations of stonewalling, asserting that the administration has not refused dialogue. She cites two specific discussion sessions as evidence of engagement and flips the script, arguing that it is the unions who have 'refused to discuss the matter.' This 'he-said, she-said' deadlock is dangerous. With the unions demanding 'serious dialogue without delay' as the only path to de-escalation, and the government standing firm on its record, the bridge between the two sides appears to be burning down, leaving the citizens of Vaud caught in the smoke.