In a significant foreign policy development, Switzerland has announced its intention to join an agreement to establish a special tribunal for the crime of aggression against Ukraine, a move praised by Council of Europe Secretary General Alain Berset.

"International law is either universal or meaningless."
"The special court stands for justice and hope."
Switzerland is drawing a definitive line in the sand. In a move that reverberates through the halls of power in Bern and beyond, the Swiss Confederation has officially joined a coalition of 35 nations and the European Union to establish a Special Tribunal for the Crime of Aggression against Ukraine. This is not merely a diplomatic gesture; it is a full-throttle commitment to holding the highest levels of leadership accountable for the invasion. By aligning with this expanded partial agreement, Switzerland signals that its historic neutrality does not equate to moral indifference. The announcement, made during a high-stakes meeting of foreign ministers in Chisinau, Moldova, places Switzerland at the vanguard of international law. Foreign Minister Ignazio Cassis has made it clear: Switzerland 'fully' supports this action plan, sending a 'clear signal' that the era of impunity for state-led aggression is coming to a violent end. As the world watches, Bern is proving that when international order is threatened, Switzerland will not sit on the sidelines.
Alain Berset is transforming the Council of Europe into a powerhouse of accountability. The former Swiss President, now serving as the Council’s Secretary General, hailed the agreement as a 'decisive step' toward the concrete establishment of the Special Court. For Berset, this is personal and professional: he asserts that the court 'stands for justice and hope.' Under his leadership, the Council—which expelled Russia shortly after the 2022 invasion—is pioneering the first-ever special court under its own auspices. Berset is not just talking about justice; he is demanding the 'functioning and financing' of the machinery required to deliver it. This is a staggering shift in momentum. The Council of Europe is no longer just a forum for discussion; it is becoming the architect of a new legal reality. Berset’s mantra that 'international law is either universal or meaningless' is now being tested on the world stage, and he is ensuring Switzerland’s fingerprints are all over the blueprint for justice.
The International Criminal Court (ICC) is powerful, but it is not enough. While the ICC grapples with war crimes and genocide, a massive jurisdictional gap has allowed the 'crime of aggression'—the very act of launching an illegal war—to go unpunished. This new tribunal is designed specifically to bridge that chasm. It will target the high-ranking figures who orchestrated the invasion, individuals who previously sat beyond the reach of existing international statutes. Switzerland is advocating for 'targeted multilateralism,' ensuring that this new court complements rather than overlaps with the ICC. Ignazio Cassis is pushing for 'greater complementarity,' arguing that the global legal architecture must be streamlined and lethal in its precision. By backing this tribunal, Switzerland is helping to build a legal net that is finally small enough to catch the big fish. This is about more than Ukraine; it is about setting a precedent that will haunt every would-be aggressor for decades to come.
The path to justice now runs through the Swiss Parliament. While the executive branch has signaled its intent, the formal establishment of the court requires a minimum of 16 states to move from political commitment to legal reality. Switzerland is currently 'on board,' but the final green light depends on domestic legislative approval. This sets the stage for a dramatic debate in Bern. Critics may argue that this move compromises Swiss neutrality, while proponents, led by Cassis, insist it is a necessary evolution of Swiss foreign policy. Beyond the tribunal, Switzerland is already deeply embedded in the 'Register of Damages' and the International Complaints Commission, proving that its commitment to a 'just and lasting peace' is multifaceted. The stakes could not be higher. As Switzerland also advocates for Kosovo’s accession to the Council of Europe to stabilize the continent, it is clear that Bern is no longer just a mediator—it is an active participant in shaping the security and legal landscape of 21st-century Europe.